Steven Brandt’s recent article in the Star Tribune, Yards Can Go Au Naturel in Minneapolis, already has 75 comments on the website. That might make one feel that Minneapolis has a nice community of people who can properly argue the merits of having a mowed lawn compared to prairie grasses and other native species on their property. I found most of the comments to be from angry folks who either blame “big government” for inappropriately interfering, or blame individuals for being too lazy to actually mow their lawns. Where’s the good debate?
I had this issue last summer (see blog posts), when we were cited for being in violation of a city ordinance – we were attempting a more sustainable approach to landscaping. Our property does have a lawn (mowed weekly, much to my chagrin), as well as some native prairie landscaping. First, let me say that prairie landscaping is not for the lazy or impatient. It requires almost constant weeding to ensure the invasive species do not take over; it also requires 3-5 years of patience until it is established.
Second, after being pissed off for a few weeks, I found I actually appreciated the city for calling it like it was: an eye sore full of weeds. It gave us the opportunity to change our landscape, for the better. We now have native wildflowers growing instead of all the weeds and grasses, and it does look a lot better. We are still attempting a smaller area of grasses, but it is much easier to manage.
Notwithstanding everyone’s personal stories and gripes, this story is about the city’s attempt to become more sustainable. Mowed lawns do take more energy, more water, and more chemicals than any other type of landscape. If we convert over our lawns, or just make them smaller, our community and our planet will benefit. And that, I believe, is the intent. So, I have to say: congratulations, Minneapolis, on your green intention!